Summing up the Torah with Love: Matthew 22:34-40, Mark 12:28-31

It seems that many regard Jesus’s response in Matthew 22:34-40, Mark 12:28-31 as a veiled implication of the nullification of the Torah:
34 Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. 35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” - Matthew 22:34-40
Jesus did state that the entire law hangs on the commandments to love God and our neighbour. This however was not revolutionary, Jesus was stating the standard belief regarding the Torah at the time.
A rabbinical sage, before Jesus, has been documented as saying: “That which is hateful to you, do not do unto another: This is the whole Torah. The rest is commentary..." - Hillel the Elder
This then is matching the sentiment of Jesus: the Torah can be summed up with Love. Mark 12 shows us this was indeed the standard view, since after Jesus responded in this manner to a "Teacher of the Law" this teacher answered : "well said..." and the teacher left happy.
Jesus was not implying that since the Torah point's to the fulfilment of these two themes that the details of the Torah should be disregarded. In fact, this was a common way of studying the Torah of the time: diving into the Torah to derive a common core principle. If such a core principle exists, what is it? If there are multiple principles or themes what are they and how many? These inquiries occupied the sages/rabbis of the second temple era.
Imagine if you asked a lawyer to paraphrase the purpose and scope of our Constitution. One such way the lawyer might describe the purpose of the Constitution, could be: “To identify and protect the rights of the American people.” Now since the lawyer has defined a common theme, a general purpose for the Constitution as a whole - does this necessarily mean that he is implying that all 7 Articles and 27 amendments have been abolished or should be abolished?
Just as a general description of the Constitution does not imply the nullification of the individual laws that comprise it, a general description or summary of the Torah does not imply the nullification of all the 613 commandments of the Torah.
In the Talmud, there is a discussion regarding the many ways the Torah has been summed up (Tractate Makkot 24A). David reduces the Torah to eleven principles in Psalm 15. Isaiah reduces the Torah to six principles in Isaiah 33:25-26. Micah summed up the Torah to three principles in Micah 6:8. Isaiah summed up the Torah to two principles in Isaiah 56:1. Habakkuk summed up the entire Torah in only one principle: Faith; in Habakkuk 2:4. And as shown before, Hillel the Elder sums up the entire Torah to the principle of Loving your neighbour.
By summing up the Torah, Jesus was contributing to a tradition of Great Prophets and men of God. We know that Jesus did not imply that the rest of the Torah should be disregarded (as if to begin the process of the chipping away of the Torah before it is completely abolished in the New Covenant) because of four things:
1.There is a Torah commandment that prohibits taking away from the Torah. If Jesus ever taught against the Torah this would have been a violation of the command and therefore a sin.
2. Deuteronomy 13 states that any prophet who leads the people away from the Torah is a false prophet and must be put to death.
3. Isaiah warns in 8:20 against those who don't confirm the Torah, stating no light dwells within them.
4. Psalm 40:7-10 states that the Messiah would have the Torah written in his heart and that he would preach the Torah (truth and righteousness) to the great assembly/congregation (which is Israel).
For these reasons its impossible that Jesus would have ever taught against the Torah and it is absolutely wrong to interpret that Jesus intended to imply that the Torah was done away with by summing up the Torah with the principle of love.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ezekiel's Temple

Ezekiel the prophet was a Levite priest and among the first wave of God’s people forcefully removed from the land by King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon after he had laid siege to the city and removed what treasures he could find. Jerusalem was spared but left bare, pillaged and with only the poor to tend to the land. The Israelites were hardened by the event and turned towards Idol worship and the practices they knew were detestable before God. The book opens when Ezekiel is near the river that ran along the side of the Israelite refugee camp in Babylon. On his 30th year, the year he would have been assigned as an active priest in the Temple, God appears to him in the glorious visage known as “Ezekiel’s Wheels.” Ezekiel observes four cherubim with wings outstretched and touching end to end. Underneath each Cherub was a set of living wheels the followed in perfect synchronicity. Above the Cherubim was a platform that supported a throne and sitting on the throne was “the appearance of the...
Read more

Matthew 5:18-20 and the doctrine of Jesus

“For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. So then, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do likewise will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” - Matthew 5:18-20 The following commentary was written by the ICC – International Critical commentary. Amazon says this regarding the ICC: “For over one hundred years, the international critical commentary series has held a special place among works on the bible. It has sought to bring together all the relevant aids to exegesis – linguistic nd textual no less than archaeological, historical, literary and theological – with a level of scholarship unmatched by any oth...
Read more